Neo-Darwinian theory about evolution


For a long while we have been told that humans mated with Neanderthals. Then we were told that humans mated with another type of ‘hominid’ called Denisovan. A recent article in New Scientist now tells us that a further type of hominid has now shown up in human DNA that has been labeled ‘Neandersovan’. These other hominds have all disappeared but small percentages of their DNA now shows up in the human genome. So I wrote to this guy who came up with this latest finding about Neandersovans. It was all becoming a bit too unbelievable for me – especially the fact that all these hominids have disappeared off the face of the Earth without any explanation.

My email to him:


I caught your article about the Neandersovans. I was wondering if you could help me with something. Lately there has been a spate of articles how humans mated with Neanderthals and Denisovans and now with hominids called Neandersovans.

Yet we are told that there is only a 1-2% difference in DNA sequence between human and chimpanzee.

So doesn't that mean that this DNA from all these hominids should be showing up in the DNA of the chimpanzee as well?


His reply:

I can see how you might think that. It's confusing but true that modern Eurasians got about 2% of their DNA from Neanderthals, and also that humans differ from chimps at 1-2% of nucleotide sites. Yet this doesn't imply that we should find Neanderthal DNA in chimps.

The two percentages are not really comparable. It's true that perhaps 2% of my DNA came from a from Neanderthal ancestor. But at the vast majority of those Neanderthal-derived nucleotide sites, humans and Neanderthals are identical.  Humans and Neanderthals are also identical at the vast majority of the nucleotide sites that I did *not* inherit from a Neanderthal. So humans are much more similar to Neanderthals than they are to chimps.

Humans have been separate from chimps about 10 times as long as they have been separate from Neanderthals. And even the shorter separation from Neanderthals was long enough to make interbreeding hard. It's unlikely that there could be interbreeding between humans and chimps.



My response to him:

Hi Alan

“Humans and Neanderthals are also identical at the vast majority of the nucleotide sites that I did *not* inherit from a Neanderthal. So humans are much more similar to Neanderthals than they are to chimps.”

With respect I can't help feeling there's a flaw in your logic here cos the vast majority of sites that were not inherited from Neanderthal must have come from the common ancestor of human, Neanderthal and chimp. The orthodox view is that human and Pan branched off 6 million years ago so all the nucleotide sites we didn't inherit from Neanderthal must have come from the common ancestor that lived millions of years before that.

Modern humans are said to have migrated out of Africa about 2 million years ago and the conventional story is that humans mated with Neanderthals about 100K years ago and Denisovans about 50K.

We are told that there is 1-2% difference in DNA sequence between human and chimp, and as the chimp only inhabits parts of Africa, the only way this can be logically feasible is to assume that before the Neanderthals and other hominids and then the humans started to migrate from Africa the genomes of human, Neanderthal and chimp, and any other hominids as well, were identical. 

A better story for the evolution of man doesn't require a missing link. A common ancestor simply evolved into humans, Neanderthals and other hominids, and chimps. You don't even need all that natural selection of adaptive phenotypes stuff. Especially as all of them at the molecular level are even more similar than sibling species. More like identical quadruplets. 

Pin It

 106398636 mediaitem106398635

The big news this week is that scientists have now ‘seen the unseeable’, they have taken an ‘image’ of a black hole. Wonder of wonders a black hole is actually shaped liked a donut with some sort of yellow radiation coming out of it. How convenient for them that this donut shaped blackhole was actually facing directly at Earth so we could see the lovely black hole inside. If this yellow radiation had actually been coming out of the black hole and covered it like a ball then we would not have been able to see the lovely black hole inside.

The problem is that this image actually contradicts everything we currently know about radio waves. For a start radiowaves have to be emitted by some sort of pulsating energy source, normally alternating current (AC) in an antenna. Where is the pulsating energy source in a blackhole?? Also the gravity is supposed to be so intense in a black hole that light (electromagnetic radiation) cannot escape from it. Yet here we see all this lovely EMR escaping from this blackhole in the shape of a Dinky Donut. The other problem is that with the donut facing us like this all that yellow EMR is not actually headed towards planet Earth. There’s no way they could have ‘received’ that EMR in their radio telescopes.

What’s happened here is that all these radio telescopes that have been coordinated on Earth to create one ‘virtual’ telescope pointing at the blackhole have actually just received radiowaves coming from behind this blackhole from all directions of the heavens and then they have done an artist’s impression of the blackhole in Adobe Photoshop. These people will probably get the Nobel Prize for this magnificent scientific discovery and it is a total scam.

On Twitter @spiritualgenome - EMR from strong source of radiowaves behind is bending around the to create Dinky Donut halo effect This proves exist & Einstein General Relativity. We'll win two

On Twitter 4/18/2019 @spiritualgenome -  said fuzzy doughnut-shaped ring of gas and dust surrounds I tweet it's EMR bending around from behind and now everybody 'knows' its Einsteins General Relativity

On Twitter 4/19/2019 @spiritualgenome -  acts as a lens focusing radiowaves bending around it no matter what direction you view it from. is the eye of Sauron

homer and blackhole Sauron and blackhole trump and blackhole


Pin It

cell site mobile phones

In an earlier blog “Oncogenes responsible for species differentiation” it was shown that oncogenes seem to play a prominent role in embryogenesis and also in cancer cases. Also oncogenes seem to be involved in excessive electrical activity in cells.

The evidence is mounting that overhead power lines can cause cancers, especially in children because they are more susceptible to electromagnetic radiation. The official view is that there is no risk to children living more than 50 meters from high voltage power lines.

Childhood leukaemia and distance from power lines in California: a population-based case-control study

Again the official view is that living close to cell phone towers does not cause cancer. For instance the American Cancer Society says:

Cell phones communicate with nearby cell towers mainly through radiofrequency (RF) waves, a form of energy in the electromagnetic spectrum between FM radio waves and microwaves. Like FM radio waves, microwaves, visible light, and heat, they are forms of non-ionizing radiation. This means they do not directly damage the DNA inside cells, which is how stronger (ionizing) types of radiation such as x-rays, gamma rays, and ultraviolet (UV) light are thought to be able to cause cancer.

So what are we to make of the following news report from CBS Sacramento Parents Blame Elementary School’s Cell Tower After 4th Student Diagnosed With Cancer

Maybe the American Cancer Society should take a look at the following research paper which found that the PVF of the hypothalamus is sensitive to radiofrequency radiation. The c-Fos protein is synthesized from the Fos Proto-Oncogene. That means that it is responsible for normal cell proliferation. Radiofrequency radiation changed the expression of the c-Fos protein which would have to raise the question whether it could cause the uncontrolled cell proliferation involved in cancer cases.

The Effects of Single and Repeated Exposure to 2.45 GHz Radiofrequency Fields on c-Fos Protein Expression in the Paraventricular Nucleus of Rat Hypothalamus


Coincidentally comes this report from the little town of Sainte-Pazanne near Nantes in France. Pediatric cancers in Sainte-Pazanne: three new confirmed cases and new reports It seems there have been 12 cases of pediatric cancers (mostly leukemia) in Sainte-Pazanne and surrounding areas and the residents have no idea what is causing it. Some speculate the power lines, some speculate pesticides may be the cause because Sainte-Pazanne is in an agricultural area. It turns out that numerous pesticides affect Fos proto-oncogene expression as well.

Effect of dimethoate on the expression of c-fos gene in skeletal muscle

Dioxin Induces Expression of c-fos and c-jun Proto-Oncogenes and a Large Increase in Transcription Factor AP-1

Atrazine potentiation of arsenic trioxide-induced cytotoxicity and gene expression in human liver carcinoma cells (HepG2)

Hexachlorobenzene-Induced Early Changes in Ornithine Decarboxylase and Protein Tyrosine Kinase Activities, Polyamines and c-Myc, c-Fos and c-Jun Proto-Oncogenes in Rat Liver

Effect of different convulsants on calmodulin levels and proto-oncogene c-fos expression in the central nervous system

Effect of gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane and its isomers on proto-oncogene c-fos expression in brain.

c-fos and ornithine decarboxylase gene expression in brain as early markers of neurotoxicity

Anticonvulsant activity of calmodulin antagonist W-7 in convulsions induced by lindane and BayK-8644: effects in c-fos expression.

Use of c‐Src and c‐Fos knockout mice for the studies on the role of c‐Src kinase signaling in the expression of toxicity of TCD

C-fos mRNA Induction in the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems of Diisopropyl Phosphorofluoridate (DFP)-Treated Hens

Peripheral ChE Inhibition Modulates Brain Monoamines Levels and c-fos Oncogene in Mice Subjected to a Stress Situation


It seems that cigarette smoke also affects the expression of Fos proto-oncogene and other proto-oncogenes. Is it possible that all these children in Sainte Pazanne who have developed pediatric cancer all live in households with heavy smokers, or their mother was a heavy smoker while they were a fetus in her womb?!

Expression of c-fos in Quiescent Swiss 3T3 Cells Exposed to Aqueous Cigarette Smoke Fractions

Effects of Cadmium on Hepatocellular DNA Damage, Proto-Oncogene Expression and Apoptosis in Rats

A Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-regulated Akt-Independent Signaling Promotes Cigarette Smoke-induced FRA-1 Expression


Acute effects of nicotine on restraint stress-induced anxiety-like behavior, c-Fos expression, and corticosterone release in mice


The Fos family of transcription factors and their role in tumourigenesis

FRA-1 Proto-Oncogene Induces Lung Epithelial Cell Invasion and Anchorage-Independent Growth In vitro, but Is Insufficient to Promote Tumor Growth In vivo

Induction of the c-jun proto-oncogene by a protein kinase c-dependent mechanism during exposure of human epidermal keratinocytes to ethanol

Progressive rise of c fos expression from premalignant to malignant lesions of oral cavity

Early atherosclerotic lesions in infancy: role of parental cigarette smoking

Downregulation of microRNA expression in the lungs of rats exposed to cigarette smoke

Cryptic brain cell injury caused by fetal nicotine exposure is associated with persistent elevations of c-fos protooncogene expression


There is not a great deal of data about electronic cigarettes but it is reasonable certain that they are just as carcinogenic as passive smoking and affect expression of Fos proto-oncogene.

Acute effects of nicotine on restraint stress-induced anxiety-like behavior, c-Fos expression, and corticosterone release in mice

Regulation of Sox2 and stemness by nicotine and electronic-cigarettes in non-small cell lung cancer

Cigarette sidestream smoke induces histone H3 phosphorylation via JNK and PI3K/Akt pathways, leading to the expression of proto-oncogenes


There is a reasonable amount of data to convince that MRI scans themselves actually affect the expression of Fos proto-oncogene and other proto-oncogenes. There appears to be no research data where MRI scan was done on a healthy brain and then tests made to see if it has affected proto-oncogene expression, but there is enough data that indicates that expression of proto-oncogenes are correlated with MRI scans.  Don’t have too many of them!!! In fact I personally know of a sculptor in Paris who went to London and had his entire body scanned with MRI in order to make of his body a work of art. He called his creation Anthopomorphic Man. He was dead from leukemia within ten years.

Expression of pituitary tumour transforming gene (PTTG) and fibroblast growth factor‐2 (FGF‐2) in human pituitary adenomas: relationships to clinical tumour behaviour

Specific Gene-Expression Profiles of Noncancerous Liver Tissue Predict the Risk for Multicentric Occurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hepatitis C Virus–Positive Patients

Metastatic Prolactinoma: Effect of Octreotide, Cabergoline, Carboplatin and Etoposide; Immunocytochemical Analysis of Proto-Oncogene Expression

Transient MRI-detected water apparent diffusion coefficient reduction correlates with c-fos mRNA but not hsp70 mRNA induction during focal cerebral ischemia in rats

Pin It

magnetic field

Post in Turing Church group on Facebook on 24th March, 2019

Well you know I have just had an epiphany of sorts. I have just realized what is responsible for all the paranormal phenomena that we experience in our 'real' world. It is the probability waves of quantum mechanics. They are responsible for the DNA Phantom Effect, Luc Montagnier's DNA waves and water, Rein's Psi activity in the DNA, mirror neurons, Sheldrake's morphogenic resonance, mental telepathy, the sense of being stared at, animals that know when their owner is coming home, birds and fish that can migrate from one part of the world to another, the group activity of bees and fish and termites and ants, the phenomenal animal magnetism of individuals in the past like Mesmer, Aleister Crowley and many cult leaders like Charles Manson and David Koresh. It's all about the probability waves of quantum mechanics surfacing in our macroscopic world as a 'force field'. Everything that science currently cannot explain is due to this force field which is the probability waves of quantum mechanics surfacing in our macroscopic world. And the ultimate message in all of this is - things ain't what they appear to be.

Post in Turing Church on Facebook on 25th March, 2019

So why would paranormal phenomena like animal magnetism, Sheldrake’s morphogenic resonance, birds being able to ‘see’ the earth’s magnetic field while migrating, mental telepathy at great distance etc be due to quantum probability waves surfacing as a ‘force field’ in the macroscopic world? Well the fact is nobody knows what magnetic field lines actually are. A magnet is created when all the electrons in a metal align in a certain direction and then it has a positive and a negative pole. And then you do the iron filings trick and you find there are magnetic field lines. And that’s about the extent of their knowledge. And we are told that the Earth has a magnetic field. So does this mean that all the electrons in the Earth are aligned in a certain direction? I don’t think so. So the Earth’s magnetic field is a complete mystery. And yet scientists attempt to explain a whole slew of extraordinary capabilities of animals fish and birds in terms of the Earth’s magnetic field. Essentially they are explaining minor mysteries by appealing to a major mystery. We do know that magnetism has to do with electrons which are quantum particles, whence I derive the theory that the Earth’s magnetic field is a ‘force field’ created by quantum probability waves operating in the macroscopic world. If a scientist in the macroscopic world makes an ‘observation’ to explain mental telepathy at a distance for example, the measuring machine will give a ‘result’ representing what ‘probably’ occurred.

Post in Turing Church on Facebook on 26th March, 2019.

Well here’s the thing. In last weeks New Scientist there was an article – Our Brains might sense the Earth’s magnetic field just like birds do. “Joseph Kirschvink at the California Institute of Technology in the US and colleagues found that altering the directions of nearby magnetic fields caused temporary changes in human brain activity. While sitting still in a dark room, participants’ brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography (EEG), while electromagnetic coils were used to create magnetic fields. The experiment mimicked the magnetic field changes we are subject to when we move about in the real world, says Kirschvink. The direction and intensity of Earth’s magnetic field varies by geographical location. For example, at the magnetic north pole, one of two poles where the magnetic field is the strongest, the direction of the field points vertically downwards, into the ground. In the wider northern hemisphere, this vertical angle changes but the magnetic field is always skewed downwards – meaning that when you hold a compass horizontally, the end pointing north is slightly pulled down. The south-pointing end of some compasses in the northern hemisphere are weighted to compensate for the pull. When the team exposed people to a downward-pointing magnetic field, they saw changes in brain wave patterns when they rotated the field horizontally in a counterclockwise direction . The team measured alpha waves – present when we are awake but relaxed and with closed eyes – before and after a 100 millisecond change in magnetic field, and found a drop in amplitude in the waves in some people following the rotation. But no participants showed brain changes when the magnetic field was rotated clockwise, a finding the researchers can’t explain. Rotating an upwards-pointing magnetic field didn’t cause a change either, which the team speculates may be because the participants’ brains were attuned to the magnetic field of the northern hemisphere, where they conducted the study.”

So the takeaway from all this is if you are an Arctic tern that makes a return trip of around 44,000 miles from pole to pole each year, flying between its breeding grounds in Greenland in the north and the Weddell Sea on the shores of Antarctica in the far south you are in someway smarter than humans cos when you cross the Equator your brain waves change and tells you how to navigate to The Weddell Sea. Actually the takeaway in all this is that our brain waves and the ‘force field’ that is the Earth’s magnetic field are correlated. In fact they are a unified force field composed of the probability waves of quantum mechanics. This is the Theory of Everything. As viewed from the north pole star Polaris, Earth turns counter clockwise. Umm.

Our Brains might sense the Earth's magnetic field just like birds do

Post in Quantum Computing on Facebook on 27th March, 2019

So let’s see what a probability wave to simulate navigation by means of magnetic field lines would look like. We’ll leave aside the question how the arctic tern evolved an instinct to take its summer vacation in the Weddell Sea in Antarctica. We’ll leave the answer to that question to really smart people like Richard Dawkins with his random genetic mutations. What we’ll do is the ‘rocket science’ involved in navigating from Greenland to the Weddell Sea and back by means of the Earth’s magnetic field. The magnetic north pole is in north Canada about 900 miles from Greenland. The Weddell Sea is the South Atlantic Ocean and the magnetic south pole is located on the other side of Antarctica about 900 miles away. Let us assume a magnetic core with the electrons aligned running thru the Earth. For the Arctic tern to set out in Greenland with a compass on its back the needle of that compass would be pointing at the North Pole in Canada 900 miles away. It has an ‘instinct’ to fly at say a 10⁰ angle to the Earth’s magnetic field lines to get to the Weddell Sea. Let us assume it would take 40 days if it flew directly to the Weddell Sea flying night and day. That’s 40 revolutions of the Earth on its geographical axis. That’s 40 times the core magnetic field of the Earth has rotated. Viewed from the side the core magnetic field of the Earth would look like two cones touching at the apex. In order to actually fly directly to the Weddell Sea the tern would have to be constantly changing its flight path in order to maintain its instinctive 10⁰ angle to the core magnetic field. Meanwhile the compass on its back has not deviated from pointing at the magnetic north pole. I don’t believe any human being could do the math. If a computer did the math and showed the flight path in a 3-D graph it would look like a corkscrew with 40 revolutions with wide amplitudes of turns at both ends and narrowing in the middle. The math would be even more complicated than what the NASA people do to do a moon landing. And this is a bird brain that’s doing all that math. In fact their flight paths are a 1000 more times complicated than that. They drift all over the place to take advantage of prevailing winds. And they take pit stops. I don’t believe the most powerful computer in the world could actually do the math to compute their flight path on the fly – maybe in the future a quantum computer could do it. This is why I say birds navigating by means of magnetic field lines is what ‘probably’ happens. In fact these terns are drawn towards the Weddell Sea by some sort of supraphysical ‘force field’ which can only be the probability waves of quantum mechanics actually computed by a quantum computer.

earths magnetic field


Post in Quantum Computing on Facebook on 27th March, 2019

Again I'm criticized for off-topic post. With the greatest respect to yourselves and Feynman I am going to rephrase his original question that actually started all this talk about quantum computers. Feynman asked the following question: can a classical, universal computer simulate any physical system, like the migration of a flock of birds? And in particular, what about quantum systems, like migrating birds navigating using the Earth's magnetic field? Well I presented to you the hypothetical flightpath of a single arctic tern navigating using the Earth's magnetic field. In a real physical system there could be hundreds of them. They are all accelerating and decelerating due to weather conditions and prevailing winds. They are flying in a curve so they involve double differentiations over time of Riemann's 3-D curvature equations. To perfectly simulate the system the differentiations should be over every interval of Planck time. In order to simulate the Earth's magnetic field you would have to simulate the magnetic core thru the Earth with all the electrons aligned only then would you have a precise simulation of the magnetic field lines. This is ridiculous you will say. We will never build a quantum computer that can do this. This is all more complex than Einstein's Field Equations. Yet all these migrating birds with all their little birdbrains solve these equations all the time on the fly. Maybe if you want to build a quantum computer that answers Feynman in the positive - you should build a birdbrain!?

bird brain technologies

Pin It

sugar code on cells

An article in New Scientist 27 March 2019 “The sugary language of our cells is giving us a new kind of medicine” demonstrates the fundamental problem that we have in scientific discoveries. These people are chemists and they are telling us that our cells use a sugar code more complex than DNA to identify and interact with each other. It turns out that every type of cell in our bodies has a unique sugar coating. And whenever anything interacts with a cell, it must recognise that sugar code and use the appropriate secret handshake.

The sugar code, known as the glycome, contains tens of different sugars that fit together in branched strings called glycans. Reading the sugar code isn’t just a case of decoding it letter by letter, but recognising the shape of each sugar and understanding what it means. That is hard. “It was so much easier to build on the DNA code, to develop tools for genomics,” says Godula.

The things that latch on to cell surface sugars in nature – the hands that do the grabbing – are proteins called lectins, which have internal cavities that fit snugly around specific sugars. We began to map out which lectins they paired with. In 2002, Ten Feizi at Imperial College London and her colleagues came up with the idea of fixing hundreds of individual sugars to a plate, then washing all sorts of lectins and other molecules over them to see which would bind. These microarrays marked the start of an automated approach to understanding the glycome.

I won’t bore you with anymore of this nonsense. What these people don’t realize is that sugar molecules are soluble in water and that the living cell in vivo is surrounded with water. They take these microarrays and dry them out and they find all sorts of weird bindings between hard sugar crystals and these lectins and they say this is some sort of a code. Above is a photo they present of all the sugar crystals on the surface of a cell. But the fact is that in vivo they are just an ion rich liquid medium that is conducting electricity.

Ions are quantum particles and they are governed by the laws of quantum mechanics. What these people are actually describing, their new ‘code’, is just a routine process in quantum biology. That photo above would be like looking at a teaspoon of sugar crystals and from that explaining what damage a bottle of Coke is doing to your body.

The sugary language of our cells is giving us a new kind of medicine

Pin It

interstitium new organ

Post in Quantum Computing on Facebook on 20th March, 2019 

Newly-Discovered Human ‘Organ’: Could This be How Cancer Spreads? 

<A newfound organ, the interstitium, is seen here beneath the top layer of skin, but is also in tissue layers lining the gut, lungs, blood vessels, and muscles. The organ is a body-wide network of interconnected, fluid-filled compartments supported by a meshwork of strong, flexible proteins.>

<The field has long known that more than half the fluid in the body resides within cells, and about a seventh inside the heart, blood vessels, lymph nodes, and lymph vessels. The remaining fluid is "interstitial," and the current study is the first to define the interstitium as an organ in its own right, and as one of the largest of the body, say the authors.>

That's right. There is a whole new organ throughout the whole body and brain and the only reason why it is there is to enable cancer cells to spread. I'll tell you why it's there. It is there to enable light signals to spread. It is an optical pathway throughout the entire body. And the fluid in this interstitium is just pure water. The light travels thru this interstitium like a vast network of optic fiber. It's all about light. Nothing but light. Light, Light, Light, Light. Forget about these qubits. They're a dead end.

Newly-Discovered Human ‘Organ’: Could This be How Cancer Spreads?

Post in Quantum Computing group on Facebook on 21st March, 2019

Well I've been criticized for posting 'off-topic' so I'll keep my mouth shut in the future. I just want to make one last point. The mere fact that that there is light (biophotons) in biological living systems means that there is a semiconductor emitting spectral lines of atoms. These biophotons are signals for intra & intercellular communication of information which means that the semiconductor is a quantum computer. So the definition of a quantum computer is a semiconductor that emits spectral lines of atoms in the course of processing, communicating and storing information. Anything else is simply not a quantum computer especially anything that can be simulated by a conventional computer. Feynman asked the following question: can a classical, universal computer simulate any physical system? And in particular, what about quantum systems? And the answer is yes. As long as you build a computer on the same principles of the quantum computer that actually operates in biological living systems - namely a semiconductor at room temperature that processes and emits information as spectral lines of atoms. Amen. Over and out.



An article in New Scientist has announced that they can attach DNA to carbon dots (quantum dots) and then spray it onto plants using an ordinary plant mister containing water and these nanoparticles bound to the DNA. The DNA, which codes for a fluorescent protein, got into cells in the plants’ leaves, prompting them to glow green under UV light. The scientists who did this have no idea how this works. I suspect that it is the fact that they shone UV light on the nanoparticles is what caused the DNA in the plant to mutate and incorporate the carbon dots.  See Schrodinger's Quantum Theory of Mutation above.

Pin It